Is Utah's Caucus System Too Easily Manipulated?
by Bryan Schott
03/19/2012 | 2047 views | 1 1 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Last week Utah's Republicans and Democrats met in their biennial caucus meetings. Some groups advised potential delegates on ways to possibly "game the system" to increase their chances of being elected.



Our Republican insiders think Utah's caucus system is fair, while Democrats think it's too easy to manipulate the process.

Do you think Utah's caucus system is fair, or is it too easily manipulated for political gain?

  Republican insiders Democratic insiders UtahPolicy.com readers
Utah's caucus system is fair 67% 11% 70%
Too easily manipulated 32% 89% 30%

Some anonymous comments:

"Any system can be manipulated. While not purely "grass roots" I prefer the kind of ground-war campaign required to be successful in a caucus more than an open primary where money and geographic concentration are rewarded."



"It's just like lobbying. The groups wouldn't be spending the money and having all the little training sessions unless it worked. Both Hatch and Freedomworks were very open about their manipulation attempts."



"Back room/LDS ward-driven pre-determination has driven the Republicans too far to the right. We see it across the major population centers, and, worse, in outlying communities."



"The caucus system should be done away with and go to a straight primary system."



"The caucus system is better than fair - it helps ensure that normal people can run. Imagine a direct primary for County Commission, or for state representative. There are 10 names on an open primary ballot. 8 of them are good candidates, but who don't have much money to put into signs, robocalls, mailers, etc. Who do you think will win? The one who spends the most money. Let's face it, 75% of the people who vote know virtually nothing about the candidates, and are too busy (and perhaps apathetic) to do any research. And with so many people, the candidates would have to resort to campaign tactics that cater to these kinds of voters. And that means the money wins. The caucus system allows candidates to focus on articulating their message to, and listening to, democratically elected neighborhood representatives."



"Candidates know how to work caucus systems. Utah has evolved, it's time to include voices from outside our caucus. Let's get a primary like the rest of civilized society. And please, no more State legislators 'bearing their testimony' to me about how patriotic the caucus system is. If something is patriotic, it should be something everyone can experience, not just white middle class males."



"The bottom line is that well-organized groups, even those with small numbers of people, can have a huge influence in local and state races disproportionate to the overall electorate. It is hard for me to justify allowing that level of power and influence in candidate selection to fringe groups. It seems to move both parties to extremes that are not representative of the majority of Utahns. The caucus system limits the choices of the electorate way to early in the process."



"The caucuses are the most difficult thing to manipulate. You would need to have a member of your special interest in every neighborhood in the state who was also well known enough in the neighborhood to be voted as a delegate. It simply doesn't happen. Those who want a different system, want it specifically so that their money can have more influence on the process in Utah."



"Caucuses are at the heart of our political system. They are the grass roots component, the only chance we have to gather with our neighbors and collaborate on responsible government, then elect someone to represent us at our conventions. The states that don't have a caucus system are, in fact, jealous of our access and process."



"I am personally frustrated by the attempt by the media and elite to paint the caucus system with a negative brush. It is blamed for everything from low voter turnout to corruption. To me it represents the essence of what it means to be American; small groups of people electing delegates to represent them in the selection of our parties candidates. Delegates voluntary give up many hours to serving their community. I would much rather have 10 informed votes make a decision rather than 100 uninformed one. Voter turnout has declined across the country not just Utah. It was high when we had the Caucus system so what has changed. The Caucus system is the last place to put blame on low voter turnout."



"I find that extremes are usually the most vocal and will make every effort to change things to greater extremes. I absolutely hate the fact that if you have a small turn out, it is extremely easy to manipulate. I like the concept, hate the reality of it. There is only an hour or two window to really attend. If you have to work, have sick kids, can't find a sitter, all of that works against the favor of the ordinary individual. With that said, a simple primary system would be simpler and would be more fair."



"There is an equal opportunity for both good players and bad players to game the systems. As long as the good players show up, they will always dominate it."



"I know my neighbors. I know who does the real work and who is manipulated/ being manipulating in my precinct. Anyone who can't tell the sincere ones from the wolves just needs to spend more time being neighborly outside of politics."



"Utah's caucus system is true representative government in action. It is politically active and motivated neighbors joining together under a banner of likemindedness and electing representatives to do the work of narrowing down the field of potential candidates for the best to be presented to the voting population. We are a Republic, not a democracy and this is the republic in action at the grass roots level and it is MUST be preserved."



"I've been going to my precinct caucus in American Fork. While there is more effort by candidates to ensure representation at the precinct level, I have not found my neighbors sucked in by orchestrated movements."



"Caucus are the most grass roots of any political process. You elect people that you know and trust to represent you. That is such a better process than a high priced primary where only the wealthy can have a voice in the process."



"The great thing about the caucus system is that it CAN'T be manipulated, unlike regular elections where the candidate with the most money can manipulate the election by burying his opponent in negative ads, spin the truth, and present an overall false impression to the mostly ignorant voters who participate in regular elections. There are almost no ignorant voters who participate in the caucuses."



"Our caucus system takes the power out of the hands of the big money corporate interests that control races in other states."



"The caucus system is a good idea. It helps prepare candidates for the voters and allows for candidates that don't have the resources to still mount a campaign. However it still can be manipulated."


Respondents include - 

Fred Adams, Stuart Adams, Jess Agraz, Scott Anderson, Patrice Arent, Bruce Baird, Tom Barberi, Heather Barney, Steve Barth, Jeff Bell, Tom Berggren, Mike Bertelsen, Ron Bigelow, Rob Bishop, Laura Black, Jim Bradley, Ralph Brown, Ken Bullock, Chris Bleak, Curt Bramble, Ralph Brown, Aaron Browning, Dave Buhler, Ken Bullock, Ric Cantrell, Maura Carabello, Rebecca Chavez-Houck, Kay Christensen, David Clark, Thomas Clay, Peter Corroon, Fred Cox, Lew Cramer, Gene Davis, Richard Davis, Brad Daw, Alan Dayton, Margaret Dayton, Mike Deaver, Brad, Dee, Joseph Demma, John Dougall, Randy Dryer, Donald Dunn, Becky Edwards, Scott Ericson, Jessica Fawson, Janice Fisher, Wendy Fisher, Lorie Fowlke, Ronald Fox, Jordan Garn, Luke Garrott, Dave Gessel, Natalie Gochnour, Robert Grow, Karen Hale, David Hansen, Neil Hansen, Joe Hatch, Jeff Hartley, Deidre Henderson, Lyle Hillyard, Randy Horiuchi, Ben Horsley, Bruce Hough, Scott Howell, Miriam Hyde, Allison Isom, Eric Jergensen, Mike Jerman, Roger Johnson, Michael Jolley, Gordon Jones, Leslie Jones, Kirk Jowers, Brian King, Scott Konopasek, Chris Kyler, Fred Lampropoulos, Douglas Larson, David Litvack, Larry Lunt, Matt Lyon, Ben McAdams, Gayle McKeachnie, JT Martin, Jason Mathis, Karen Mayne, Derek Miller, Rob Miller, Ethan Millard, Brett Millburn, Karen Morgan, Mike Mower, Holly Mullen, Wayne Niederhauser, Mike Noel, Ralph Okerlund, James Olsen, Val Oveson, Scott Parson, Kelly Patterson, Frank Pignanelli, Jason Powers, Joe Pyrah, Mike Reberg, Jill Remington Love, Lauren Richards, Holly Richardson, Robin Riggs, James Roberts, Luz Robles, Ross Romero, Don Savage, Bryan Schott, Jay Seegmiller, Patrick Shea, Randy Shumway, Soren Simonsen, Jeremy Slaughter, Carol Spackman-Moss, Howard Stephenson, Mike Styler, Todd Taylor, Juliette Tennert, Gary Thorup, Kevin Van Tassell, Royce Van Tassel, Michael Waddoups, Chuck Warren, Christine Watkins, LaVarr Webb, Todd Weiler, Alan West, Ted Wilson, Carl Wimmer, Mike Winder, Thomas Wright

Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
|
March 20, 2012
It's all about who shows up. Last week proved that. When the LDS Church hammered it home over pulpits all over Utah that members all over the state should show up and participate (in the caucuses), both parties' meetings were filled to overflowing. The result was a more representative outcome, which helped Sen. Hatch and hurt his opponents who counted on highly motivated people from the fringes.

Don't show up. Don't complain. That's the lesson here.
today's headlines
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Ten Things You Need to Know for Friday
by Bryan Schott
May 24, 2013 | 3453 views | 0 0 comments | 2 2 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Countdown: There are 166 days to the 2013 municipal elections, 249 days until the start of the 2014 Legislature, 525 days until the 2014 midterm elections and 962 days until the 2016 Iowa Caucuses. 

An analysis says expanding Medicaid coverage will save Utah more than $130 million and would give health insurance to 123,000 residents [Tribune].

A new report ranks Utah #1 for economic outlook next year [Utah Policy, Tribune].

House Majority Leader Brad Dee goes on a European vacation with three lobbyists, but Dee insists the trip was above board because everybody paid their own way and they didn’t discuss politics [Tribune].

Former Attorney General Mark Shurtleff is caught on tape offering to get $2 million for Utah Businessman Darl McBride if he would shut down a website critical of another Utah businessman. That money was to come from a third Utah businessman who was in trouble with the Attorney General’s office [Tribune].

Former Legislator and current blogger Holly Richardson says she’s had enough with the “culture of corruption” permeating the Attorney General’s office [Holly on the Hill].

Sen. Orrin Hatch wants to hear from Utahns who think they have been inappropriately targeted by the IRS as part of his investigation into misconduct by the agency [Tribune].

Kennecott lays off 100 workers because of the massive landslide at their Bingham Canyon Mine [Tribune, Deseret News].

The Boy Scouts vote to allow gay members in their ranks [Deseret News].

Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman launches a new political action committee to support Republicans who share his point of view [Tribune].

Gov. Gary Herbert says he is confident the state can work out a deal to avoid taxing the electricity used by the new National Security Agency data center at Camp Williams [Tribune].
Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
utah tweets
RSS Feeds
Utah policy stories feed
Policy buzz feed
Daily news highlights feed
Washington watch feed

With support from UtahWebStuff.com