The impact in Utah—where 197,187 Utahns are covered by ACA marketplace plans, 340,000 children, pregnant women, seniors, and people with disabilities receive Medicaid, and 1.8 million Utahns with employer-based coverage benefit from free preventive care, protections for pre-existing conditions, and a ban on annual and lifetime benefit caps—would be similarly disastrous.
“Good policy should be evaluated not just by its results, but how it accomplishes them,” says Matt Slonaker, executive director of the Utah Health Policy Project (UHPP).
“Lowering premiums for the lucky few by kicking older, poorer, and sick Utahns to the curb is a gimmick, not smart or effective policy. Neither is selling plans that strip away vital benefits like mental healthcare, preventive care, and lab tests so that your health insurance won’t help you when you need it most. Today’s CBO report shows again that Congress is abdicating its responsibility to pursue healthcare reform that actually makes the majority of Utah families physically and financially more secure.”
While the CBO predicted the GOP plan could lower average premiums in some states by 4 to 20 percent by 2026, the reason why is troubling: the AHCA would spike premiums and out-of-pocket costs for many older, sicker, and low-income Utahns—causing them to drop their coverage. Excluding these consumers from the marketplace would decrease average premiums for those lucky or healthy enough to stay insured, but it would also spike Utah’s uninsured rate and increase demand for charity care at Utah’s clinics and emergencies rooms.
- First, the AHCA allows insurers to charge Utahns over age 40 much higher premiums, which the CBO predicted would cause many older people to drop their coverage.
- Second, the AHCA’s skimpier tax credits would provide insufficient financial support for many Utahns—especially those who earn low, moderate, or fluctuating incomes, are older, or have kids covered by Medicaid or CHIP—leading them to drop their coverage as it becomes unaffordable.
- Third, the AHCA’s tax credits fail to account for higher premiums and costs in rural areas, leading to reduced coverage in Utah’s many rural counties.
- Fourth, the CBO anticipates that Utah and other states will pursue waivers to let insurers cut major benefits like mental health, maternity care, and basic medications from their plans, leading to “Swiss cheese” plans underlined with fine print that restrict more benefits than they actually pay for.
- Fifth, the AHCA allows states to pursue a new waiver that would let insurers discriminate against Utahns with pre-existing health conditions—creating an avenue to push people with even minor medical conditions out of coverage and into flimsy high-risk pools or make them permanently uninsurable.
Despite over 85% of Americans favoring protections for pre-existing conditions, the AHCA would allow states like Utah to bring back discrimination against even minor health conditions. This would allow insurers to charge premiums as high as $5,000 a month based on a person’s health history, effectively pricing these consumers out of coverage.
- Allow states to use waivers to bring back discrimination against Utah kids and adults with pre-existing conditions and raise premiums for older consumers
- Allow insurers to bring back annual and lifetime caps on coverage benefits for Utah workers covered by employer-sponsored health insurance
- Raise premiums and deductibles for tens of thousands of Utah families
- Allow insurers to limit and cut benefits like maternity care, mental healthcare, prescription drugs, lab tests, and hospitalization
- Cut benefits, enrollment, and reimbursements for Utah's 340,000 kids, pregnant women, and seniors who depend on Medicaid